I have said many times that I would rather swim a mile than run a mile. I do not like running. I have too many moving pieces to enjoy running, thanks. I have heard that eventually you space out enough that you relax in a way, that while you work out somehow you're disconnected from your body in good ways. Yeah, I cannot get much past the pain in my chest, feet, back, etc.
However, I can do that in swimming. My mind is wandering off in different directions as I make it down to the other end again. I can pick a few things I want to focus on as far as working on my stroke, but I think more about which lap I'm on, arguing whether it was the twelfth or thirteenth, until I need to worry about whether it was the thirteenth or fourteenth. I spend enough time arguing with myself that I'm the right kind of distracted and still making good time.
What I think I like most is that I can carry that feeling with me for the next couple of hours outside of swimming my laps. Part of it is knowing that I did something good for myself, certainly, but that right kind of detached calm, I find that it makes the exercise feel worth it for longer than I was expecting.
There are other things that illicit that kind of calm for me. I have my desktop at work set to pictures of the Aurora. When I catch a glimpse of that, I take a deep breath involuntarily and feel a similar wave of peace.
I can remember having a conversation with a friend of mine once about how different people can connect better to different environments. My father and I, there's something about water that touches us. Something about sailing with the wind and the water together soothes my soul and mind in a very unique way that I know I need once in a while. My friend pulls energy from desert environments and has since moved to New Mexico. I know a few people that find it in the trees and some others that love mountains. Some of that is how you connect to nature, and it is different for different people. Either way, I would argue that the sense of calm and peace is the same.
The real trick is learning how to bring it with you. I can cheat a bit by going swimming, mixing that zen from water and the exercise high together, which is more successful some days than others. But how can I take it with me when I'm not in a comparable space?
I haven't figured out how to do it all of the time, yet, but I think collectively we could use a little more of it, particularly as the full flurry of the season begins to settle upon us. I find those moments of calm wherever I can--I've got a feeling that I'm going to need it, for reasons I'm not even completely sure of yet. I would encourage anyone to take a moment of self reflection to learn how to reach that space, if you're not sure how to find it, and otherwise exercise taking that kind of zen with you. Find your peace and hold onto it.
Monday, November 30, 2015
Saturday, November 28, 2015
Secret World
So, as I may have mentioned before, living with my husband is a barrel of laughs.
When we both get tired, we get punchy and ridiculous.
As an example, Andy went to tickle me the other night. I turned around to tickle him back immediately and he yelps and cries, "Ah! Don't tickle me back! This was supposed to be one-way! I didn't think things through!" I have to admit it was an effective strategy because I was laughing too hard to continue.
Or another night, I don't remember how this was relevant to the conversation, but I brought up gazpacho. Andy asked, "What, like the Italian mafia? No, wait, the mafia is Italian." I replied, "Honey, I think you're thinking of 'gestapo,' and that's German. And that is still not gazpacho."
This is not to say that I have never had a ridiculous moment or several, but I have conveniently forgotten them just now...
These are just a couple examples of the things that make us laugh in our house. There are many, many things that take far too much time to explain, are prime examples of "you just had to be there," or are not appropriate for *ahem* polite conversation. On occasion, I do wish that I could remember or otherwise share because spending time with Andy brings me joy. On the other hand, we have our own secret world and there is something beautiful about that. How we act outside of the house? We really do act about the same, only at a higher concentration with the appropriate amount of lazy because, hey, we're at home. There are some things that we don't talk about in earnest until we're at home--like not criticizing the service until we've left the restaurant because the kinds of problems weren't worth talking about at the table--but both of us are authentic to ourselves outside of these walls.
I think everyone's secret world is different. Mostly because all people are different, yes, but there are also different kinds of strategies for decompressing, maintaining a house, managing bills, etc. And each house works differently and hopefully works in a healthy way. Otherwise, we only see what people choose to show us. Some people match their mask closely, some do not. I argue that either way, the mask is there. If masks don't work for you, I like filters as an analogy even better. Home, I am darn-near unfiltered. In certain company, I have a certain filter--"me" is still coming through, but select parts of "me" that are appropriate for the situation. How much we allow people to see, sometimes it depends on how hard you push or how you ask. Truly, some people may choose to never open up to you and that is okay--there are some well-meaning people that you may still not want to spill all your life secrets out to.
Andy and I find that complete strangers will open up to us on occasion. Sometimes, we'll be able to stop everything and listen to the person in question and remember that we're all human and need to have that moment. Other times, we're trying to find the most polite way to extradite ourselves. I'm not sure specifically what it is about us that makes us trustworthy to strangers and friends. Maybe it's just as simple as being good listeners? Bearing that in mind, do some people have more access to secret worlds than others?
Either way, over this long weekend I've had a lot of time to think about how much I enjoy just spending time with my husband. I'm really thankful for our little world, full of spontaneous songs, ridiculous stories, moments of rest, and whatever trouble we get into next.
...and you thought you were done with the Thanksgiving sugar coma, didn't you?
When we both get tired, we get punchy and ridiculous.
As an example, Andy went to tickle me the other night. I turned around to tickle him back immediately and he yelps and cries, "Ah! Don't tickle me back! This was supposed to be one-way! I didn't think things through!" I have to admit it was an effective strategy because I was laughing too hard to continue.
Or another night, I don't remember how this was relevant to the conversation, but I brought up gazpacho. Andy asked, "What, like the Italian mafia? No, wait, the mafia is Italian." I replied, "Honey, I think you're thinking of 'gestapo,' and that's German. And that is still not gazpacho."
This is not to say that I have never had a ridiculous moment or several, but I have conveniently forgotten them just now...
These are just a couple examples of the things that make us laugh in our house. There are many, many things that take far too much time to explain, are prime examples of "you just had to be there," or are not appropriate for *ahem* polite conversation. On occasion, I do wish that I could remember or otherwise share because spending time with Andy brings me joy. On the other hand, we have our own secret world and there is something beautiful about that. How we act outside of the house? We really do act about the same, only at a higher concentration with the appropriate amount of lazy because, hey, we're at home. There are some things that we don't talk about in earnest until we're at home--like not criticizing the service until we've left the restaurant because the kinds of problems weren't worth talking about at the table--but both of us are authentic to ourselves outside of these walls.
So many secrets... |
Andy and I find that complete strangers will open up to us on occasion. Sometimes, we'll be able to stop everything and listen to the person in question and remember that we're all human and need to have that moment. Other times, we're trying to find the most polite way to extradite ourselves. I'm not sure specifically what it is about us that makes us trustworthy to strangers and friends. Maybe it's just as simple as being good listeners? Bearing that in mind, do some people have more access to secret worlds than others?
Either way, over this long weekend I've had a lot of time to think about how much I enjoy just spending time with my husband. I'm really thankful for our little world, full of spontaneous songs, ridiculous stories, moments of rest, and whatever trouble we get into next.
...and you thought you were done with the Thanksgiving sugar coma, didn't you?
Monday, November 23, 2015
Winter Carols
Inevitably, there are persons who turn on their Grinch face to anything Christmas until after Thanksgiving. There's an odd self-righteous attitude when said person (maybe it's you) tries to enforce that Christmas decorations should not go up until Thanksgiving. Firstly, I have worked retail enough to know that this is a losing battle. Secondly, I will sing Christmas carols at ANY time of the year and no scolding has stopped it yet nor does it seem likely to.
I don't just celebrate being alive on my birthday, so I don't see the sense in not watching a Christmas movie or feeling the Christmas spirit just because it's not cold enough outside.
However, if you have a particularly Scrooge-y soul that does not want to hear Christmas Carols except for the month of December, I present you with a wonderful, wonderful loophole.
There are a number of Winter Carols, songs that get lumped in as Christmas Carols, but don't actually have anything to do with Christmas.
I don't just celebrate being alive on my birthday, so I don't see the sense in not watching a Christmas movie or feeling the Christmas spirit just because it's not cold enough outside.
However, if you have a particularly Scrooge-y soul that does not want to hear Christmas Carols except for the month of December, I present you with a wonderful, wonderful loophole.
There are a number of Winter Carols, songs that get lumped in as Christmas Carols, but don't actually have anything to do with Christmas.
- "Jingle Bells" This is actually a Thanksgiving song. See if you can find a line that implies differently.
- "Let it Snow" This song is about the weather and staying inside where it's warm. It's more a love song than it is a Christmas song.
- "I've got my Love to Keep me Warm." Same vein as the former.
- "Baby, it's Cold Outside" Ditto, even though it can get a little creepy.
- "Sleigh Ride" Just about the exhilaration of a sleigh ride
- "Winter Wonderland"
- "Frosty the Snowman"
- "Over the River and through the Woods"
- "Marshmallow World"
- And Andy tells me that there's a song called "Suzy Snowflake" that I actually haven't heard of
If you want to get technical, "The 12 Days of Christmas" continues after Christmas itself if someone is trying to shut down carols after New Years. And if we want to get super technical, you could be singing "We Three Kings" for a long time, since the wise men were actually not at the nativity.
There we have it, some carols that you can get away with all through February at least.
One of my Favorite Things
So this weekend saw one of my favorite things happen once again: The Festival of Trees. This event has sparked off the Christmas season in my mind for a few years now, that first genuine hint of real holiday wonder and excitement all in one space. This year, I made it there twice, once with my parents and a car-full from their new church and another time with a few of Andy and my friends that had not experienced it before. I have been telling random strangers about it the whole week leading up to it.
For those that haven't heard of Festival of Trees, it has been going on for twenty-two years now, brought to the Baby Fold by Ralph Dude, God rest him. People and groups will take a tree, full-sized or short, and decorate it. Some are really classy, some take a theme and go off running with it--the year that Frozen came out, there were at least three Frozen-themed trees--and some are in honor some a person or a cause. In addition to the trees, there are now table settings, wreaths, art pieces, gingerbread houses, signed memorabilia, and more. Sometimes, the trees come with tickets to an event or a spa day or one year a plumbing company decorated a tree and threw in a free toilet and sink. All of these donations are then bid on, all of the money going to the Baby Fold. What's really cool, too, was that these things have been donated, even by the celebrity factor, at the simple asking. We saw large donations volunteered just at the asking on opening night. It's amazing what can happen when you just ask.
And it is truly a worthy cause. The Baby Fold is an organization that helps with adoption services, foster care, family counseling, care for wards of the state and students with special needs, and more. I have known many people touched by the work of this organization.
So there you have it--great cause and super, happy, holiday factor. I will share a few of my favorites with you from this year.
For those that haven't heard of Festival of Trees, it has been going on for twenty-two years now, brought to the Baby Fold by Ralph Dude, God rest him. People and groups will take a tree, full-sized or short, and decorate it. Some are really classy, some take a theme and go off running with it--the year that Frozen came out, there were at least three Frozen-themed trees--and some are in honor some a person or a cause. In addition to the trees, there are now table settings, wreaths, art pieces, gingerbread houses, signed memorabilia, and more. Sometimes, the trees come with tickets to an event or a spa day or one year a plumbing company decorated a tree and threw in a free toilet and sink. All of these donations are then bid on, all of the money going to the Baby Fold. What's really cool, too, was that these things have been donated, even by the celebrity factor, at the simple asking. We saw large donations volunteered just at the asking on opening night. It's amazing what can happen when you just ask.
And it is truly a worthy cause. The Baby Fold is an organization that helps with adoption services, foster care, family counseling, care for wards of the state and students with special needs, and more. I have known many people touched by the work of this organization.
So there you have it--great cause and super, happy, holiday factor. I will share a few of my favorites with you from this year.
A well done gingerbread house, done by an 11-year old, if I remember correctly |
Elegance |
Stylish, classy theme |
And a well-executed whimsical theme |
And some weird themes that can work |
Cthulhu Santa demands your cheer. |
Sunday, November 22, 2015
The Cinnamon Roll Test
My boss has brought in these wonderful, fluffy cinnamon rolls to work before and I had asked him for his recipe, hoping to bring those to Grandma's house for dinner. I made up Dad's bread dough recipe the night before and let it rise. This is the part I've done many times before.
Then the directions got a little fuzzy. "Combine milk and brown sugar until it's spreadable." I made a brown sugar and milk slurry. Evidently, there was too much milk. It looked fine on the bread dough rolled out. I make a pumpkin roll usually a few times every holiday, which involves rolling a cake in a flour sack, letting it cool, unrolling it, smothering it in frosting, re-rolling it up, and slicing it to serve in these beautiful little pinwheels of deliciousness. Ergo, rolling the cinnamon rolls up and then slicing them into individual rounds made sense.
The problem came in the rolling.
As I started to roll it up, the slurry started to move in slow, sloppy wave with it. And it didn't stay in a round kind of roll, instead falling like a deflated tire, more of the slurry oozing out the ends.
This was the "pretty" pan. |
This resulted in some urgency in the slicing, where it was a race to a) cut it before everything oozed out and b) get it over to the pan without more of it dripping on to the floor, since the only place there was room for the pans was on the counter behind me. Some of the rolls dissolved into a sad puddle. I picked those up, squeezed some of the brown sugar and milk slurry off, and made some cinnamon crescent rolls instead (featured in the bottom of that picture).
However, this left the pool of slurry on my counter. It was viscous enough that I could take sweep it up and cup a few handfuls over into the sink. Three times, no less, taking handfuls of brown sludge over to the sink, remarkably not dripping much at all.
Thankfully, everything was water soluble, but it really did take about as much time to clean that up as it did to bake them, once they had some time to rise again.
So, about those slurry puddles that formed around my rolls? Yeah, that made a kind of caramel at the bottom of my pans. I found that the pan I started prying up from first was much easier than the second one I did, since it had a little more time to cool. It did not make the chewy, stretchy kind of caramel--it was rock hard once it cooled. There were many effort noises as I tried to pull them up in one piece AND not fling them up to the ceiling by accident because goodness knows that they would have stuck there, with the way my luck was going.
Note sticky outlines. |
And yet, for all of that chaos, they tasted well enough. Dad's dough has been a favorite for a long time, and my boss's recommendations for how to make them cinnamon rolls was pretty good, if not any kind of precise (with all kinds of love, Chuck!). I have a few ideas on how I'm going to make this better next time, including not flattening out the bread dough quite that far and using a LOT less milk in making my brown sugar spread. It was still edible and enjoyed. And we've officially gotten to the "well, that was pretty hilarious" space, recounting the adventure and the sheer mess of what I made in the kitchen. I have left the scraping of those pans for another day, thanks.
Hipster Mentality
It happens every now and again that I have a well-meaning person suggest something to me enough that I decide I never want to try it. As an example, the Final Fantasy series. The more that something has been touted to me, the less inclined that I am to want to try it. A trusted source suggests something? Sure, I'll put it on my list. The whole world is singing its praises? I don't want much anything to do with it, thanks. Football and iPhones are on that list of things I don't really care for and mostly because they're so popular. (As an aside, I like being with people and going to events, so I will go to a game, but I don't choose to watch a football game on my own.) At first, I just called this "being stubborn," but my brother has informed me that I have a hipster mentality.
The thing is, I cannot decide if this a good thing or a bad thing. If I finally do try something that has had its praised up and down, there are two ways it can go:
1. It's not all that great. My expectations are set so high at the point because everyone has been talking about it or one person has not stopped talking about it, that it is actually impossible for said thing to meet those expectations. As an example, Avatar. It's a pretty movie, I'll give it that, but it's Dances with Smurfs--it's the colonization narrative told in the same way and didn't do anything new to it except get distracted by its own world. And the ending? Total cop-out. Want a well-done story that tackles similar themes? Chinua Achebe's Things Fall Apart is really well done. I'm harsh on this movie for a few reasons, but one of them was because the world was so caught up in it that I couldn't escape hearing about it.
2. It's actually pretty awesome. The best example I can think of this one is Firefly. I had heard about this series from a few people and was not quite to the point of resisting when I finally saw it. It lived up to the expectations.
So on the one hand, I can be protected by not suckering in to something just because it's popular, but on the other, I can miss out on something that I might really enjoy. That is not to say that I don't like things that happen to by popular--in fact, I don't have a really good theory as to what makes some things go one way or the other, but I have narrowed down some commonalities.
It's the glasses, isn't it? |
1. It's not all that great. My expectations are set so high at the point because everyone has been talking about it or one person has not stopped talking about it, that it is actually impossible for said thing to meet those expectations. As an example, Avatar. It's a pretty movie, I'll give it that, but it's Dances with Smurfs--it's the colonization narrative told in the same way and didn't do anything new to it except get distracted by its own world. And the ending? Total cop-out. Want a well-done story that tackles similar themes? Chinua Achebe's Things Fall Apart is really well done. I'm harsh on this movie for a few reasons, but one of them was because the world was so caught up in it that I couldn't escape hearing about it.
2. It's actually pretty awesome. The best example I can think of this one is Firefly. I had heard about this series from a few people and was not quite to the point of resisting when I finally saw it. It lived up to the expectations.
So on the one hand, I can be protected by not suckering in to something just because it's popular, but on the other, I can miss out on something that I might really enjoy. That is not to say that I don't like things that happen to by popular--in fact, I don't have a really good theory as to what makes some things go one way or the other, but I have narrowed down some commonalities.
- If I have already happened upon said thing before it becomes a big thing, then it's okay to still like it.
- I have certain sources that I trust because we have similar tastes and their recommendations have proven solid in the past. The opinion of these sources can cut through some of the hype.
- Pure exposure--the more I hear about it, the more I push against it.
- The verbage in how something is pushed plays into it, too. Anything that is touted as the "best thing ever" or something that will "change my life" either directly stated or wholly implied is an instant turn off.
It has occurred to me more than once that this is not specifically fair, because when you like something, you want to share it, yet some people are just better at persuading than others. We're bombarded with advertising all of the time that it's tiring, too, to sort through all of the things we should be trying or buying that deciding what I want to spend my money and energy on is difficult enough.
I have an open mind about many, many things, but I do not have time for everything. The line has to be drawn somewhere. I just hadn't put a name to some of my own decision making process. But hipster is mainstream now anyway so I'm confused enough as it is.
Monday, November 16, 2015
Kings and Centipedes (Or "Another Another Song Stuck in my Head")
Yes, centipedes. We see them every now and again in our house, and it another reason that I'm hoping for a cold winter, to make sure that they are at least mostly wiped out again. They pop up every now and again, some small black moving thing just in the corner of your eye, more startling than terrifying. There was a particular incident last week where I had taken my glasses off and was about to turn the water on for the shower when I saw a fuzzy black blob moving in the tub: suddenly, I was very awake, and when I put on my eyes again, it was officially the biggest centipede I had seen yet. Andy's beard shampoo (yes, it is a special shampoo for his beard) was the closest blunt object I could find.
Thank you for your sacrifice. |
I had a proper icky-dance after that one, all the same. So, suffice to say, I don't have a high opinion of centipedes. So the title of this song caught me off guard in any case.
But click here and check out the song for yourself: "Kings and Centipedes" by Stepdad.
I've put another of their songs up here before, "Must Land Running," for those that might recall, and this is definitely more of that Stepdad flair. "Kings and Centipedes" starts off without much real warning--it is bright and rolling and a few flavors of upbeat that can catch you off-guard if you're not expecting it. It definitely falls into that category of "songs that I have a hard time NOT dancing to."
As with many songs, the chorus drew me in:
"Rise to your feet my god, you must maintain your dignity
Rise to your feet my god, what have you got to prove to me?
Rise to your feel my god, you must maintain your dignity
There's lots of middle ground between the kings and centipedes."
Particularly that last line. That was the real hook for me. This one was of those songs that I listened to over and over and couldn't immediately figure out why it touched me. "There's lots of middle ground between the kings and centipedes," has always meant to me that there is room between the very best and the very worst. It's easy to polarize opinions of yourself, where we get into a rut of I'm really good at X and really bad at Y. For some reason, we don't give ourselves any middle ground whatsoever. I tell you truly, you don't have to be the very best in order to be good at something. If you are not the very best, that does not mean that you are the worst at it.
Let me say that again: if you are not the very best, that does not mean that you are, by default, terrible.
There is so much middle ground there; can we allow ourselves that luxury? Creative careers have a real problem with this especially, where if you have not won a Pulitzer or sold your art somehow we start thinking that our art isn't good enough. If you're not a best-seller, why are you writing? It's hard to keep creating when you don't feel recognized. Do we have enough heart to keep pressing on even when no one tells us it's good? Can we believe in ourselves enough to know a) it has goodness in it and b) it doesn't matter anyway?
For the first part of the chorus, "Rise to your feet my god, you must maintain your dignity," I haven't decided whether it's an exclamation from an encouraging source--Get up, for the love of Pete!--or if someone is talking to their inner ego. Either way, the voice is commanding that they keep pressing forward, even through the circumstances of whatever has brought that figure down.
And then another call to take heart and stand up again with the reminder "What have you got to prove to me?" What are you trying to prove? Who are you trying to prove it to? And why do we hold ourselves to impossible standards of all or nothing?
The verses reinforce the idea of pushing past these walls we've created, with the repeating order to "Bang the Timpanis!" either to create a rhythm to trudge forward again or in celebration and otherwise recognizing some of the weight on the world pulling the figure down. I like to think of it as a conversation with a good friend or with yourself, finding the courage to start up again after a low moment. There's another area of focus in the verse "Dying to know how do the rumors lock up your majesty and will the new ones set you free?" as well as "Did I really change the way you think about everything?" The opinions of others really can factor strongly into how much or how soon we want to jump back up and try again.
But the key point that I want to really hammer home is that I hope you will give yourself the leeway to not be the best or the worst. Talent is on a scale rather than a yes/no checkbox. How good you are at your job is not based off of how good someone else is at their job. Doing the best that you can do and being the best that you can be is more important that being THE best. Love yourself enough to allow you to be who you are and to celebrate that.
But click here and check out the song for yourself: "Kings and Centipedes" by Stepdad.
I've put another of their songs up here before, "Must Land Running," for those that might recall, and this is definitely more of that Stepdad flair. "Kings and Centipedes" starts off without much real warning--it is bright and rolling and a few flavors of upbeat that can catch you off-guard if you're not expecting it. It definitely falls into that category of "songs that I have a hard time NOT dancing to."
As with many songs, the chorus drew me in:
"Rise to your feet my god, you must maintain your dignity
Rise to your feet my god, what have you got to prove to me?
Rise to your feel my god, you must maintain your dignity
There's lots of middle ground between the kings and centipedes."
Particularly that last line. That was the real hook for me. This one was of those songs that I listened to over and over and couldn't immediately figure out why it touched me. "There's lots of middle ground between the kings and centipedes," has always meant to me that there is room between the very best and the very worst. It's easy to polarize opinions of yourself, where we get into a rut of I'm really good at X and really bad at Y. For some reason, we don't give ourselves any middle ground whatsoever. I tell you truly, you don't have to be the very best in order to be good at something. If you are not the very best, that does not mean that you are the worst at it.
Let me say that again: if you are not the very best, that does not mean that you are, by default, terrible.
There is so much middle ground there; can we allow ourselves that luxury? Creative careers have a real problem with this especially, where if you have not won a Pulitzer or sold your art somehow we start thinking that our art isn't good enough. If you're not a best-seller, why are you writing? It's hard to keep creating when you don't feel recognized. Do we have enough heart to keep pressing on even when no one tells us it's good? Can we believe in ourselves enough to know a) it has goodness in it and b) it doesn't matter anyway?
For the first part of the chorus, "Rise to your feet my god, you must maintain your dignity," I haven't decided whether it's an exclamation from an encouraging source--Get up, for the love of Pete!--or if someone is talking to their inner ego. Either way, the voice is commanding that they keep pressing forward, even through the circumstances of whatever has brought that figure down.
And then another call to take heart and stand up again with the reminder "What have you got to prove to me?" What are you trying to prove? Who are you trying to prove it to? And why do we hold ourselves to impossible standards of all or nothing?
The verses reinforce the idea of pushing past these walls we've created, with the repeating order to "Bang the Timpanis!" either to create a rhythm to trudge forward again or in celebration and otherwise recognizing some of the weight on the world pulling the figure down. I like to think of it as a conversation with a good friend or with yourself, finding the courage to start up again after a low moment. There's another area of focus in the verse "Dying to know how do the rumors lock up your majesty and will the new ones set you free?" as well as "Did I really change the way you think about everything?" The opinions of others really can factor strongly into how much or how soon we want to jump back up and try again.
But the key point that I want to really hammer home is that I hope you will give yourself the leeway to not be the best or the worst. Talent is on a scale rather than a yes/no checkbox. How good you are at your job is not based off of how good someone else is at their job. Doing the best that you can do and being the best that you can be is more important that being THE best. Love yourself enough to allow you to be who you are and to celebrate that.
And get yourself a Burger King crown to make yourself feel better if you need to. |
Saturday, November 14, 2015
Intellectual Grieving
There are a lot of major problems in the world right now, with violence in Lebanon, Beirut, and, of course, France. I've been distracted, however, with some sudden illness in my family.
We brought food to my aunt and cousins in the hospital, cooking on the way up. We were hearing only snatches and scattered updates the day before with enough information to be concerned, but certainly not to understand what was actually happening with my uncle. So I turned my mind instead to logistics. Andy and I decided quickly that it wasn't a question of "if" we were going to visit my family but "when," and I did not want to come up empty-handed. I know that it's easy for family members and friends to forget to eat when you're worried about someone you love, so I had a ready distraction for the day, thinking through the logistics of setting up soup for the back of the car. We had it in a box with a towel on top all belted down, a layer of foil underneath the lid, all in all managing to not spill the whole, full batch in our backseat. Next time though, we would definitely leave it on Low instead of Warm.
Thinking of something else can help me get through some of the initial reactions to a traumatic event, but I was reminded that there is certainly a point where we should re-engage the mind again. One of the hardest parts for my family right now is trying to piece together what actually happened. In the worst game of telephone ever, where originally we were told car accident, and then other theories have been working through as everyone, and especially my uncle, is trying to piece together something that we'll never have the full truth of (unless someone wants to confess to video cameras in my aunt and uncle's house).
But until we can piece together at least some working theories, the emotional coping is a little stuck. I hadn't realized that other people have to walk through cognitive understanding as part of the coping process. As part of my coping with illness and life, I specifically have had to dive in to some biological understanding of what my body is doing and the pharmacology to help find that grounding. However, I thought perhaps I was a special little snowflake because I've run across so many people that can't explain their condition to me or certainly cannot tell me why they take a specific medication, that, of course, assuming that they can pronounce or even list what their medications are.
I tend to wrap my intellectual understanding on "how?" but there are many people that prefer to put their attention more on "why?" The question of "how?" is on the science spectrum; the question of "why?" leans more toward theology or otherwise looking at your predicament in the larger spectrum. When trying to rationalize a situation, it can take the same kind of energy. Some people need to do both, some people might not want to do either, but some kind of understanding seems necessary in the grieving process--we cannot treat real acceptance like the iTunes user agreement.
Everyone grieves differently, and all too often the pressure seems to be to simply ignore grief instead of work through it. There are different components of that process, all of which vary in importance by the situation and by the day. It's easy to get caught in a trap, too, where someone helping you through a situation (or yourself) can focus on only one component of the healing, whether it's emotional (including relationships), spiritual, intellectual, or physical. However, if you've recovered in one or some of these areas but not all, the process is not complete or as complete as it's going to be for now.
The hardest part is figuring out which you need and when you need it. That takes time and self-awareness. But it is a necessary thing. Take the time and energy to grieve how and in all the ways that you need to, as healthfully as possible.
If anyone tells you that an AC outlet is a useless accessory, they clearly have not thought about driving with a crock-pot. |
Thinking of something else can help me get through some of the initial reactions to a traumatic event, but I was reminded that there is certainly a point where we should re-engage the mind again. One of the hardest parts for my family right now is trying to piece together what actually happened. In the worst game of telephone ever, where originally we were told car accident, and then other theories have been working through as everyone, and especially my uncle, is trying to piece together something that we'll never have the full truth of (unless someone wants to confess to video cameras in my aunt and uncle's house).
But until we can piece together at least some working theories, the emotional coping is a little stuck. I hadn't realized that other people have to walk through cognitive understanding as part of the coping process. As part of my coping with illness and life, I specifically have had to dive in to some biological understanding of what my body is doing and the pharmacology to help find that grounding. However, I thought perhaps I was a special little snowflake because I've run across so many people that can't explain their condition to me or certainly cannot tell me why they take a specific medication, that, of course, assuming that they can pronounce or even list what their medications are.
I tend to wrap my intellectual understanding on "how?" but there are many people that prefer to put their attention more on "why?" The question of "how?" is on the science spectrum; the question of "why?" leans more toward theology or otherwise looking at your predicament in the larger spectrum. When trying to rationalize a situation, it can take the same kind of energy. Some people need to do both, some people might not want to do either, but some kind of understanding seems necessary in the grieving process--we cannot treat real acceptance like the iTunes user agreement.
Everyone grieves differently, and all too often the pressure seems to be to simply ignore grief instead of work through it. There are different components of that process, all of which vary in importance by the situation and by the day. It's easy to get caught in a trap, too, where someone helping you through a situation (or yourself) can focus on only one component of the healing, whether it's emotional (including relationships), spiritual, intellectual, or physical. However, if you've recovered in one or some of these areas but not all, the process is not complete or as complete as it's going to be for now.
The hardest part is figuring out which you need and when you need it. That takes time and self-awareness. But it is a necessary thing. Take the time and energy to grieve how and in all the ways that you need to, as healthfully as possible.
And have some comfort food in the meanwhile. |
Wonder
I saw something beautiful a couple weeks back that I wanted to share with you.
Andy and I went to my parent's house for the weekend, including going to church. The praise band got up and ready to lead music for the second service. There was a guitar, three singers, a bass, a drummer, and...a four year old boy. He had his own guitar--not a ukulele, a child-sized guitar--and he was watching very closely so he could strum in time with the guitarist. While he was strumming along, he'd move his top hand from time to time and you could hear a chord every now and again with the rest of the band. He started off next to the guitarist, but he made his way over to the bass player and over to the singers, one of which he was related to. He had a big grin and was so jubilant to be up there. I wanted to take a picture but a) did not think I could take one that would give the vision justice, b) didn't want to get in position to try and take a good picture in the middle of church, and c) wouldn't put up a picture on the internet of a minor without permission anyway.
I hope that you can trust me, though, when I tell you it was truly something beautiful. Here's the thing, though: I know people that would have been actively upset that he was up there, that the music wasn't just right for "their service." In fact, when my folks were introduced to this child's parents, they made sure to mention that they could have him stop if it was going to be a problem. My father is definitely a "let the children come to me" kind of pastor, so he immediately reassured them that this little boy was not only welcome with the praise band but very much encouraged. So many people could have stomped on that little boy and the joy he had in being part of that group.
I cannot promise that it meant as much to him now as it will in a few years, but I think understanding that you are wanted and included has a great impact regardless. That feeling should stay with him, even if playing the guitar doesn't.
There was another beautiful sight that Sunday as well: Andy played his accordion and sang a song, which is always lovely, but what was really special about it was the group of kids that came up to inspect his accordion afterwards. Andy held court over about eight of them, all varying ages and none of which seemed to have seen an accordion in person before. When Andy let them press a button or pull out the bellows, they were genuinely excited and asked a lot of questions, all of which Andy patiently answered. A couple of brothers swore that they were going to have their father buy them one, which the father immediately chimed in that they were expensive (the boys weren't concerned for some reason).
Where do we lose our wonder, that brazen ability to go up and ask questions, and the excitement of having a new experience?
Sometimes, it's beaten out of us, like if someone were to take the four year old's guitar and tell him that he wasn't allowed to play with the band anymore. Sometimes, we believe it when people tell us we're not good enough. Sometimes, we're just too worn down to appreciate the world around us.
To a child, most everything is new, but there is more to our experiences than novelty. Truly, it can just be a matter of perspective. Andy, for example, still has a child-like wonder about many things, and I love him for it. I ask a lot of questions because I'm genuinely excited to learn something new. I have known other people that have retained that spark, where they retain that wonder and joy of experience at all ages. I also have known people that have been dead since eighteen but won't be buried for many years yet.
How this wonder is lost, there are many ways and many reasons. A traumatic incident shocked it out of you; it was ultimately stomped-out by either direct antagonism or lack or support; or perhaps there are too many things to worry about in the world to spend the time to encourage that sensation any more, so it fades away. Reclaim that part of yourself; it used to be a part of you at some time. Wonder is not only something beautiful to witness in a child, but it is a whole perspective on the world. Particularly in a time where hopelessness and tragedy is broadcast and omnipresent, keeping open and appreciative of the ordinary beauty around you can become a defense mechanism in and of itself. That perspective shift can be enough relief and distance to think through the rest of how we need to attack the world from there. Or it can at least take some of the stress out of the holiday season. What better time than the holiday season to indulge in the sensation once again?
Andy and I went to my parent's house for the weekend, including going to church. The praise band got up and ready to lead music for the second service. There was a guitar, three singers, a bass, a drummer, and...a four year old boy. He had his own guitar--not a ukulele, a child-sized guitar--and he was watching very closely so he could strum in time with the guitarist. While he was strumming along, he'd move his top hand from time to time and you could hear a chord every now and again with the rest of the band. He started off next to the guitarist, but he made his way over to the bass player and over to the singers, one of which he was related to. He had a big grin and was so jubilant to be up there. I wanted to take a picture but a) did not think I could take one that would give the vision justice, b) didn't want to get in position to try and take a good picture in the middle of church, and c) wouldn't put up a picture on the internet of a minor without permission anyway.
I hope that you can trust me, though, when I tell you it was truly something beautiful. Here's the thing, though: I know people that would have been actively upset that he was up there, that the music wasn't just right for "their service." In fact, when my folks were introduced to this child's parents, they made sure to mention that they could have him stop if it was going to be a problem. My father is definitely a "let the children come to me" kind of pastor, so he immediately reassured them that this little boy was not only welcome with the praise band but very much encouraged. So many people could have stomped on that little boy and the joy he had in being part of that group.
I cannot promise that it meant as much to him now as it will in a few years, but I think understanding that you are wanted and included has a great impact regardless. That feeling should stay with him, even if playing the guitar doesn't.
There was another beautiful sight that Sunday as well: Andy played his accordion and sang a song, which is always lovely, but what was really special about it was the group of kids that came up to inspect his accordion afterwards. Andy held court over about eight of them, all varying ages and none of which seemed to have seen an accordion in person before. When Andy let them press a button or pull out the bellows, they were genuinely excited and asked a lot of questions, all of which Andy patiently answered. A couple of brothers swore that they were going to have their father buy them one, which the father immediately chimed in that they were expensive (the boys weren't concerned for some reason).
Where do we lose our wonder, that brazen ability to go up and ask questions, and the excitement of having a new experience?
Sometimes, it's beaten out of us, like if someone were to take the four year old's guitar and tell him that he wasn't allowed to play with the band anymore. Sometimes, we believe it when people tell us we're not good enough. Sometimes, we're just too worn down to appreciate the world around us.
To a child, most everything is new, but there is more to our experiences than novelty. Truly, it can just be a matter of perspective. Andy, for example, still has a child-like wonder about many things, and I love him for it. I ask a lot of questions because I'm genuinely excited to learn something new. I have known other people that have retained that spark, where they retain that wonder and joy of experience at all ages. I also have known people that have been dead since eighteen but won't be buried for many years yet.
How this wonder is lost, there are many ways and many reasons. A traumatic incident shocked it out of you; it was ultimately stomped-out by either direct antagonism or lack or support; or perhaps there are too many things to worry about in the world to spend the time to encourage that sensation any more, so it fades away. Reclaim that part of yourself; it used to be a part of you at some time. Wonder is not only something beautiful to witness in a child, but it is a whole perspective on the world. Particularly in a time where hopelessness and tragedy is broadcast and omnipresent, keeping open and appreciative of the ordinary beauty around you can become a defense mechanism in and of itself. That perspective shift can be enough relief and distance to think through the rest of how we need to attack the world from there. Or it can at least take some of the stress out of the holiday season. What better time than the holiday season to indulge in the sensation once again?
Sunday, November 8, 2015
November Goals
Hey, all!
So November has rolled around, even though the weather doesn't seem much like it. Some have embraced this season all the same with some special frenzy: for those who haven't heard of it, it is NaNoWriMo. This is an acronym for National Novel Writers' Month.
It's a competition with yourself in spirit with many, many other people to write a novel in the month of November, specifically 50,000 words. Everyone writes their own 50K, but there is a community of support, where people participate in write-ins--meeting other participants somewhere nearby to write or talk together--or comment on forums when someone needs an professional opinion--what actually would happen to a nuclear reactor in X situation from a fellow writer who is actually a nuclear physicist is a real example I had seen on one of the boards--and other general advice/prompts/encouragement. Even persons with no actual experience in writing can get a great deal out NaNoWriMo.
The idea isn't necessarily to create great art, but to create quantity and, even more importantly, to get into the habit of creating. I have won NaNoWriMo at least three times and each time I was back into a better habit of writing for at least a while longer again. What have I done with these completed pieces? Not much, but, again, that the act of creation itself can have as much value if not more than the actual product.
I've been spending a lot of time assessing my goals of late: I'm working on some professional goals in learning new material, I'm taking piano lessons, I've been going back to the gym, and, oh yeah, I started this blog thing. The hardest part, particularly with working the gym time back in there, is managing my energy. Living with a chronic illness is always subconsciously about managing your energy. If a healthy person runs out of energy it means a complete different thing than if a chronically ill person runs out of energy. When I am done, I am done. As an example, the difference is between "I have just enough to get back home" or "someone needs to carry me into the house." On bad days, taking a shower and getting dressed would deplete what I had for most of the day. In my major recuperation from Mayos, I would eat something and immediately go to sleep, being unconscious for the majority of the day if possible because there wasn't much else I was able to do anyway or on enough heavy medications that I couldn't focus well. I also don't bounce back nearly so well as I would like, meaning that when I try to borrow energy against tomorrow, it's a slow climb back to normal usually over a few days to be okay again. I've gotten to a point where I consistently have enough energy to get through the work day, but what I can do in the evening is still always in flux.
I remember having energy to do most everything. I had a ridiculously packed schedule for some long stretches in college, one of those periods of time I started dating Andy on top of all else--I could still make time for what was important, but I had everything planned down to minutes. I expected some energy depletion when I got older, but I really have no idea how much better this might or might not get.
Some of this is my long explanation for why I haven't updated much recently. But some of this coupled with this month being NaNoWriMo inspires this declaration: I want to post at least fifteen different blog posts in the month of November. Going for the whole NaNoWriMo goal this month I know would be too much (not that I couldn't catch up by this point--I've done 10K in a weekend before). When I have done NaNoWriMo, this usually means that I have to sequester myself accordingly, and I'm also not willing to do that this go around. In fact, I've already neglected my husband enough with some of my new interest in going to the gym--I do like spending time with him, actually. As such, yes, there will be many updates happening. I expect the subject matter to be a certain flavor of varied, too, not to mention some of the quality. This is where I'm choosing to direct some of that energy for the next while. Thanks for coming along for the ride through this exercise.
The idea isn't necessarily to create great art, but to create quantity and, even more importantly, to get into the habit of creating. I have won NaNoWriMo at least three times and each time I was back into a better habit of writing for at least a while longer again. What have I done with these completed pieces? Not much, but, again, that the act of creation itself can have as much value if not more than the actual product.
I've been spending a lot of time assessing my goals of late: I'm working on some professional goals in learning new material, I'm taking piano lessons, I've been going back to the gym, and, oh yeah, I started this blog thing. The hardest part, particularly with working the gym time back in there, is managing my energy. Living with a chronic illness is always subconsciously about managing your energy. If a healthy person runs out of energy it means a complete different thing than if a chronically ill person runs out of energy. When I am done, I am done. As an example, the difference is between "I have just enough to get back home" or "someone needs to carry me into the house." On bad days, taking a shower and getting dressed would deplete what I had for most of the day. In my major recuperation from Mayos, I would eat something and immediately go to sleep, being unconscious for the majority of the day if possible because there wasn't much else I was able to do anyway or on enough heavy medications that I couldn't focus well. I also don't bounce back nearly so well as I would like, meaning that when I try to borrow energy against tomorrow, it's a slow climb back to normal usually over a few days to be okay again. I've gotten to a point where I consistently have enough energy to get through the work day, but what I can do in the evening is still always in flux.
I remember having energy to do most everything. I had a ridiculously packed schedule for some long stretches in college, one of those periods of time I started dating Andy on top of all else--I could still make time for what was important, but I had everything planned down to minutes. I expected some energy depletion when I got older, but I really have no idea how much better this might or might not get.
Some of this is my long explanation for why I haven't updated much recently. But some of this coupled with this month being NaNoWriMo inspires this declaration: I want to post at least fifteen different blog posts in the month of November. Going for the whole NaNoWriMo goal this month I know would be too much (not that I couldn't catch up by this point--I've done 10K in a weekend before). When I have done NaNoWriMo, this usually means that I have to sequester myself accordingly, and I'm also not willing to do that this go around. In fact, I've already neglected my husband enough with some of my new interest in going to the gym--I do like spending time with him, actually. As such, yes, there will be many updates happening. I expect the subject matter to be a certain flavor of varied, too, not to mention some of the quality. This is where I'm choosing to direct some of that energy for the next while. Thanks for coming along for the ride through this exercise.
Saturday, November 7, 2015
Celebrity Worship
I realized that I forgot an important group when talking about loving things that don't love you back--celebrity worship. I just don't get it.
How many posters, t-shirts, signed whatevers, and all else do we keep and place in a space of honor in our home? Memorabilia can be a highly lucrative market because people have collectively decided that this particular scribble on a piece of paper or a photograph makes it valuable.
When we forget that our chosen celebrity is a person and not a god, we can find ourselves at some interesting crossroads. When a celebrity does something wrong--illegal or just morally grey--so many people that they have never met either condemn their actions or rise up to their defense. And then this becomes the most important topic of conversation. Over a person that we will likely never meet. And regarding circumstances that we will probably never be fully privy to and frankly will never be essential to know or enriches my life in any way. And yet, that's sometimes all people talk about, myself included.
Where is the line between appreciation and idolatry? I know lots of other people that are really good at their jobs, but their positions, while important, are less public. It seems that artistic careers--acting, music, writing, etc.--tend to veer more toward this kind notoriety, with a some exceptions into academia and bleeding over into sports. Actually, any career that demands an audience, which included politicians, too--I suppose that would have to be the common denominator.
What do people do with fame when they have it? We've seen people burn out in a great explosion, people who realize they don't want to be famous, people who will do anything to stay relevant, and those who can turn the experience into something good. I was watching Castle the other day and the moral lesson was that "Money doesn't change you. It just magnifies who you are." I think fame works in much the same way.
Then idols become caricatures of people, exaggerating features and stretching proportions. And somewhere along the way, we forget that they were or are people in the first place. We do the same thing to historical figures. When that emotion and complexity is stripped away, we lose our ability to empathize with them or otherwise understand their situation. With celebrities, we often jump to judging without giving anyone the benefit of the doubt or rise to the defense without considering possibilities. With historical figures, they've been so washed out with time that don't remember that the decisions people made were factoring in rich context, the background that individual brought in the situation, and the real pressure of the event.
For the historical events, it's easier to process some of them when we don't remember that they were real people, but so much is missed when we don't factor that in. How have these decisions changed our world moments at a time?
For the celebrities, I feel that we do this on purpose. However, I don't have a good, clean answer as to why. My brother and I watched Maury for a while mostly because it was something that a) made us feel better about ourselves as human beings for not making the same choices and b) it was mesmerizing and difficult to avert ones gaze, like passing by an accident on the side of the road. We wanted these persons to be less than people so that we could safely judge without repercussions. Sometimes, it is just the opposite, that we want to elevate these persons, strip them of their humanity, in order to look up to them and have something to aspire to. Either way, I don't think that we do this consciously, but still with intention.
We lose something when we take away someone's humanity and see them as something less than human. People are such much easier to group when we strip away their differences and their complexity. As an example: "He's just a thug/ tool/ millennial/ snob/ hipster/ minimum-wage lackey/ dick/ conservative/ democrat/ whaterverelse." It's easier to demonize people when we see them as less than human. Anytime someone says "The problems in this country are caused by [specific group of people]," I cringe for many of reasons. The great atrocities against our own species start by reducing people to something as less than human. Even that asshole that cut you off yesterday has complexity and is a person. He might actually be an asshole, but he is more than that, too. (As an aside, I tend to grudgingly assume that they're on the way to the hospital trying to get to someone they love; it helps me forgive them.)
Remembering that people are people and subject to the same respect and dignity regardless of what they look like or what box they fit in, that's a real trick. It changes how you approach people and situations. All persons are deserving of respect and dignity, because they have value simply in being people. I would like to take that one step further, that I don't believe necessarily that one person is more important than another. There are those I love more and know better, but everyone has value. People caught in war, in poverty, in health crises, or whatever else have my sympathy and empathy where I can. We are connected in our humanity.
It's easier to put people in boxes. Everyone has reasons for why they act and are a certain way--not excuses, per say, but reasons. It's an investment to take the time to consider that when there is a real urge to judge instead. It's easier to judge. It's easier to assume. It's so much faster, too, and saves a great deal of effort. And what do we now do with all of that extra time and energy that we have? ...wait in line for an autograph? I would rather take the extra moment to treat the people I will meet respect, give people the benefit of the doubt, and otherwise remember that we are all people. At least when I have the energy to do so. It's a habit worth trying to break.
How many posters, t-shirts, signed whatevers, and all else do we keep and place in a space of honor in our home? Memorabilia can be a highly lucrative market because people have collectively decided that this particular scribble on a piece of paper or a photograph makes it valuable.
When we forget that our chosen celebrity is a person and not a god, we can find ourselves at some interesting crossroads. When a celebrity does something wrong--illegal or just morally grey--so many people that they have never met either condemn their actions or rise up to their defense. And then this becomes the most important topic of conversation. Over a person that we will likely never meet. And regarding circumstances that we will probably never be fully privy to and frankly will never be essential to know or enriches my life in any way. And yet, that's sometimes all people talk about, myself included.
Where is the line between appreciation and idolatry? I know lots of other people that are really good at their jobs, but their positions, while important, are less public. It seems that artistic careers--acting, music, writing, etc.--tend to veer more toward this kind notoriety, with a some exceptions into academia and bleeding over into sports. Actually, any career that demands an audience, which included politicians, too--I suppose that would have to be the common denominator.
What do people do with fame when they have it? We've seen people burn out in a great explosion, people who realize they don't want to be famous, people who will do anything to stay relevant, and those who can turn the experience into something good. I was watching Castle the other day and the moral lesson was that "Money doesn't change you. It just magnifies who you are." I think fame works in much the same way.
Then idols become caricatures of people, exaggerating features and stretching proportions. And somewhere along the way, we forget that they were or are people in the first place. We do the same thing to historical figures. When that emotion and complexity is stripped away, we lose our ability to empathize with them or otherwise understand their situation. With celebrities, we often jump to judging without giving anyone the benefit of the doubt or rise to the defense without considering possibilities. With historical figures, they've been so washed out with time that don't remember that the decisions people made were factoring in rich context, the background that individual brought in the situation, and the real pressure of the event.
For the historical events, it's easier to process some of them when we don't remember that they were real people, but so much is missed when we don't factor that in. How have these decisions changed our world moments at a time?
For the celebrities, I feel that we do this on purpose. However, I don't have a good, clean answer as to why. My brother and I watched Maury for a while mostly because it was something that a) made us feel better about ourselves as human beings for not making the same choices and b) it was mesmerizing and difficult to avert ones gaze, like passing by an accident on the side of the road. We wanted these persons to be less than people so that we could safely judge without repercussions. Sometimes, it is just the opposite, that we want to elevate these persons, strip them of their humanity, in order to look up to them and have something to aspire to. Either way, I don't think that we do this consciously, but still with intention.
We lose something when we take away someone's humanity and see them as something less than human. People are such much easier to group when we strip away their differences and their complexity. As an example: "He's just a thug/ tool/ millennial/ snob/ hipster/ minimum-wage lackey/ dick/ conservative/ democrat/ whaterverelse." It's easier to demonize people when we see them as less than human. Anytime someone says "The problems in this country are caused by [specific group of people]," I cringe for many of reasons. The great atrocities against our own species start by reducing people to something as less than human. Even that asshole that cut you off yesterday has complexity and is a person. He might actually be an asshole, but he is more than that, too. (As an aside, I tend to grudgingly assume that they're on the way to the hospital trying to get to someone they love; it helps me forgive them.)
Remembering that people are people and subject to the same respect and dignity regardless of what they look like or what box they fit in, that's a real trick. It changes how you approach people and situations. All persons are deserving of respect and dignity, because they have value simply in being people. I would like to take that one step further, that I don't believe necessarily that one person is more important than another. There are those I love more and know better, but everyone has value. People caught in war, in poverty, in health crises, or whatever else have my sympathy and empathy where I can. We are connected in our humanity.
It's easier to put people in boxes. Everyone has reasons for why they act and are a certain way--not excuses, per say, but reasons. It's an investment to take the time to consider that when there is a real urge to judge instead. It's easier to judge. It's easier to assume. It's so much faster, too, and saves a great deal of effort. And what do we now do with all of that extra time and energy that we have? ...wait in line for an autograph? I would rather take the extra moment to treat the people I will meet respect, give people the benefit of the doubt, and otherwise remember that we are all people. At least when I have the energy to do so. It's a habit worth trying to break.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)